Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Palliative care national plan implementation through stakeholder analysis

  • Miguel Antonio Sánchez-Cárdenas (Correspondent Author)
  • , Marta Ximena León-Delgado (Second Author)
  • , Lina María Vargas-Escobar (Third Author)
  • , Sofia Elizabeth Muñoz Medina (Fourth Autor)
  • , Paula Milena Buitrago Florian (Fifth Author)
  • , David Andrade Fonseca (Another Number Author)
  • , Juan Esteban Correa-Morales (Another Number Author)
  • Universidad El Bosque

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: National palliative care plans depend upon stakeholder engagement to succeed. Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step in the implementation of public health initiatives, as recommended by the World Health Organisation. However, utilising stakeholder analysis is a strategy underused in public palliative care. Objective: To conduct a stakeholder analysis characterising a diverse group of stakeholders involved in implementing a national palliative care plan in three rural regions of an upper-middle-income country. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design, complemented by a quantitative stakeholder analysis approach, was executed through a survey designed to gauge stakeholders’ levels of interest and capability in relation to five fundamental dimensions of public palliative care: provision of services, accessibility of essential medicines, palliative care education, financial support, and palliative care vitality. Stakeholders were categorised as promoters (high-power, high-interest), latent (high-power, low-interest), advocates (low-power, high-interest), and indifferent (low-power and low-interest). Stakeholder self-perceived category and knowledge level were also assessed. Results: Among the 65 surveyed stakeholders, 19 were categorised as promoters, 34 as advocates, 9 as latent, and 3 as indifferent. Stakeholders’ self-perception of their category did not align with the results of the quantitative analysis. When evaluated by region and palliative care dimensions the distribution of stakeholders was nonuniform. Palliative care funding was the dimension with the highest number of stakeholders categorised as indifferent, and the lowest percentage of promoters. Stakeholders categorised as promoters consistently reported a low level of knowledge, regardless of the dimension, region, or their level of interest. Conclusions: Assessing the capability, interest, and knowledge of stakeholders is a crucial step when implementing public health initiatives in palliative care. It allows for a data-driven decision-making process on how to delegate responsibilities, administer financial resources, and establish governance boards that remain engaged and work efficiently.

Original languageEnglish
Article number163
JournalBMC Palliative Care
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2024

Strategic Focuses

  • Vida Humana Plena (Vita)​

Article Classification

  • Full research article

Indexación Internacional (Artículo)

  • ISI Y SCOPUS

Scopus-Q Quartil

  • Q1

ISI- Q Quartil

  • Q1

Categoría Publindex

  • A1

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Palliative care national plan implementation through stakeholder analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this