International consensus on the management of large (≥20 mm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi study

Roupen Djinbachian (Primer Autor), Douglas K. Rex (Segundo Autor), Han Mo Chiu (Tercer Autor), Norio Fukami (Cuarto Autor), Hiroyuki Aihara (Quinto Autor), Barbara A.J. Bastiaansen, Robert Bechara, Pradeep Bhandari, Amit Bhatt, Michael J. Bourke, Jeong Sik Byeon, Daniela Cardoso, Akiko Chino, Philip W.Y. Chiu, Evelien Dekker, Peter V. Draganov, Shaimaa Elkholy, Fabian Emura, John Goldblum, Amyn HajiShiaw Hooi Ho, Yunho Jung, Hiroshi Kawachi, Mouen Khashab, Supakij Khomvilai, Eun Ran Kim, Roberta Maselli, Helmut Messmann, Leon Moons, Yuichi Mori, Yukihiro Nakanishi, Saowanee Ngamruengphong, Adolfo Parra-Blanco, María Pellisé, Rafael Castilho Pinto, Mathieu Pioche, Heiko Pohl, Amit Rastogi, Alessandro Repici, Amrita Sethi, Rajvinder Singh, Noriko Suzuki, Shinji Tanaka, Michael Vieth, Hironori Yamamoto, Dong Hoon Yang, Chizu Yokoi, Yutaka Saito (Autor Corresponsal), Daniel von Renteln (Autor Corresponsal)

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

6 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Objectives: There have been significant advances in the management of large (≥20 mm) laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) or nonpedunculated colorectal polyps; however, there is a lack of clear consensus on the management of these lesions with significant geographic variability especially between Eastern and Western paradigms. We aimed to provide an international consensus to better guide management and attempt to homogenize practices. Methods: Two experts in interventional endoscopy spearheaded an evidence-based Delphi study on behalf of the World Endoscopy Organization Colorectal Cancer Screening Committee. A steering committee comprising six members devised 51 statements, and 43 experts from 18 countries on six continents participated in a three-round voting process. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations tool was used to assess evidence quality and recommendation strength. Consensus was defined as ≥80% agreement (strongly agree or agree) on a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Forty-two statements reached consensus after three rounds of voting. Recommendations included: three statements on training and competency; 10 statements on preresection evaluation, including optical diagnosis, classification, and staging of LSTs; 14 statements on endoscopic resection indications and technique, including statements on en bloc and piecemeal resection decision-making; seven statements on postresection evaluation; and eight statements on postresection care. Conclusions: An international expert consensus based on the current available evidence has been developed to guide the evaluation, resection, and follow-up of LSTs. This may provide guiding principles for the global management of these lesions and standardize current practices.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)1253-1268
Número de páginas16
PublicaciónDigestive Endoscopy
Volumen36
N.º11
DOI
EstadoPublicada - nov. 2024

Focos Estratégicos

  • Vida Humana Plena (Vita)​

Clasificación de Articulo

  • Artículo completo de investigación

Indexación Internacional (Artículo)

  • ISI Y SCOPUS

Scopus-Q Quartil

  • Q1

ISI- Q Quartil

  • Q1

Categoría Publindex

  • A1

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'International consensus on the management of large (≥20 mm) colorectal laterally spreading tumors: World Endoscopy Organization Delphi study'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto